Allowance

With the recent request from Nicki Minaj to speak at her Alma mater being denied I found it appropriate, but then the decision made me think why? Thinking about why, lead to me questioning the whole Hip-Hop musical landscape. Why do we make certain allowances for certain artists when others would be vilified?

When I first heard that Nicki Minaj wanted to speak at her old high school and was denied, my first reaction was “of course!” Why would they let her speak to a group of school children when her music has been less than inspirational? Her stage name for starters is a play on the phrase “ménage à trois” which translates to 3 people engaged in sexual activity together. This is not the most universally palatable name, but it is a stage name nonetheless, whatever. Then I began to think about the recent singles Minaj has put out and they are all problematic when making a case to speak to impressionable school children. First on the list is one song that drummed up a lot of controversy amongst fans and critics and elicited response records from many of her male rap counterparts, which is “Looking Ass Nigga.” The whole premise of the record was to berate men who posed as something they weren’t. I thought the record was male bashing, but it did its job in terms of doing to men what men have said about women over the years in Hip-Hop. Again, I thought whatever. Nicki’s latest single “Anaconda” is a song about men with big penises and getting her “salad tossed.” Again, I don’t care because men in Hip-Hop have been making sexually explicit songs for years. Why is it then that we impose respectability politics to Nicki Minaj and make allowances for someone like Beyoncé who also makes sexually explicit songs?

Please Read The Rest @ Black Youth Project

Advertisements

3 Comments Add yours

  1. VEYA says:

    VERY GOOD POINT AND I AGREE. I THINK IT GOES BACK 2 WANTIN DA CELEBRITY OR ARTIST 2 B DA PARENT. I LET MUSIC DO WAT ITZ INTENDED 2 DO…ENTERTAIN… LEAVE CHANGIN DA WORLD 2 THESE POLITICS.LOL I FIND IT FUNNY HOW THESE WHITE “POP STARS” TALK ABT EVERYTHING FROM GIRL ON GIRL ACTION,DOIN DRUGS ETC… AND THERES NO BACKLASH, AS WELL AS THEM DRESSIN SEXY, COLORED WEAVES/WIG….WHITE PPL DO IT ITZ ART..WHEN WE DO IT ITZ RATCHET!!

    Like

  2. Idriys says:

    Dang, I didn’t even know her songs were saying all that.

    In response to the question why Beyone and not Niki, I think there is a difference in vulgarity when it comes to the two. Plus, Beyoncé riding her husbands “surfboard” can be justified as well it’s her husband. Niki Menaj is speaking about several different men’s penises in “Anaconda”.

    I agree that sexually explicit is sexually explicit and if we as a society are going to draw the lines on what is appropriate “public music” the lines aught never be selective. The last thought could be the comparison between light skinned Beyoncé and dark skinned Niki Menaj. Vilifying a dark skinned person has been part of media mind control/society influence since television inception.

    Like

  3. Vaughn says:

    Good Job Keev! Def made me think about that topic.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s